I did not take this photo.
Motion
Picture three was taken at a fast shutter speed at approximately 1/640 of a second. The action that I froze was Seth Lapriore kicking the skateboard away. The distance from Seth is far, but the distance of the skateboard is close. The movement of the skateboard is an element that helps strengthen the photo. It also follows the rule of thirds because the board is on the left side of the photo and Seth Lapriore is on the right side of the photo.
Photo four was taken at a slow shutter speed at approximately 1/25 of second. The action that I blurred was Benjamin Roche blowing on a pinwheel, causing the pinwheel to spin. The distance is close up. The pinwheel is perfectly centered in the picture so it doesn't follow the rule of thirds. strength in the photo is that the pinwheel appears blurry but the whole background in the photo is clear.
Photo four was taken at a slow shutter speed at approximately 1/25 of second. The action that I blurred was Benjamin Roche blowing on a pinwheel, causing the pinwheel to spin. The distance is close up. The pinwheel is perfectly centered in the picture so it doesn't follow the rule of thirds. strength in the photo is that the pinwheel appears blurry but the whole background in the photo is clear.
Painting with Light
Picture 5, titled "Outline of Slap", was taken at an 8 second shutter speed. This was to ensure that there would be enough time to outline his body. The light source used in the phot was a flashlight. It was used to trace Seth's body. The affect was achieved by successfully tracing Seth's within the 8 second shutter speed. The viewer would feel flabbergasted becuase the outline of Seth is so clear.
Aperture/Depth of Field
Photo 1 has a small depth of field. The f-stop used to create this affect was f/6.3. My ISO was set to 800 and the white balance was fluorescent.
Photo 3 has a large depth of field. The f-stop used to create this affect was f/13. My ISO was set to 800 and the white balance was fluorescent.
I believe that photo 3 is better because I prefer when everything in the photo is in focus. Using a shallow depth of field is better when you just want one specific thing in focus opposed to a large depth of field which is when you want everything in focus. In the first set of photos I have, I believe they look better with everything in focus.
Photo 3 has a large depth of field. The f-stop used to create this affect was f/13. My ISO was set to 800 and the white balance was fluorescent.
I believe that photo 3 is better because I prefer when everything in the photo is in focus. Using a shallow depth of field is better when you just want one specific thing in focus opposed to a large depth of field which is when you want everything in focus. In the first set of photos I have, I believe they look better with everything in focus.